I have thought of the different dichotomies and connections between Wesch and Turkle, but I think my review on them is how they are advocating on the same team. Sure, they have different positions, but their end goal is the same. I would like to look at the final lines they left us with:
"My job becomes less about teaching, and more about encouraging students to join me on the quest." - Wesch
"So I say, look up, look at one another, and let’s start the conversation." - Turkle
Both are advocating for conversations to happen in the classroom, and outside the classroom. I am so enthralled with how they are united, that I am forgetting why I ever thought they were polar opposites. I guess I could see how Turkle is committed to the idea of taking away technology for students to understand the art of having a conversation. While Wesch is trying to balance the idea of having 500 students in a classroom and allowing them to discover their own takeaways from history through their own means. I think the difference is their class size can create a huge change in the teaching style. If Wesch was able to have more intimate conversations with his students, I imagine he would be more like Turkle.
Here is a clip from John Green about what will be on the test. #AcademicCrush
I also agree with you and love the concise way you made your point by putting their final lines together. I wish I'd thought of that! ;) It would be interesting to listen to a conversation between these two writers.
I also agree with you and love the concise way you made your point by putting their final lines together. I wish I'd thought of that! ;) It would be interesting to listen to a conversation between these two writers.
ReplyDelete